Vitamins and Supplements Articles
To Supplement – or NOT? That is the question! – by by Sharon M. Weinstein, MS, RN
Are Calcium Supplements Really a Cause Of Heart Attacks? – by by Martha H. Howard, MD
Vitamin D and Your Health – by Dr Tom Bayne
What’s Really In Your Fish Oil and Omega 3 Fatty Acids? – by Dr Tom Bayne
B Vitamins And Memory – by Dr Kristina Sargent
Vitamin B12 and How To Make Sure You Are Getting Enough – by Karen Erickson
Do You Really Need That Shoebox Full of Pills? – by Dr Martha Howard
Taking Probiotics Greatly Reduces Infections in Athletes – by Mayer Eisenstein
Sunscreen & Vitamin D – by by Robert C. Scott, DC CCSP
July 30, 2009 — Americans spend almost a third as much money out-of pocket on herbal supplements and other alternative medicines as they do on prescription drugs, a new government report shows.
Out-of-pocket spending on herbal supplements, chiropractic visits, meditation, and other forms of complementary and alternative medicines (CAM) was estimated at $34 billion in a single year.
The estimate was based on responses to a national health survey conducted in 2007 by the CDC’s National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS).
“The bottom line is that Americans spend a lot of money on CAM products, classes, materials and practitioner visits,” National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM) Director Josephine P. Briggs, MD, said in a media briefing today. “We estimate that this (represents) approximately 11% of the total out-of-pocket spending on health care.”
Although we should obtain most of our nutrients from food, we know that with the quality of our environment, the earth in which food is grown, and more – it is indeed difficult to get all that we need from food alone. Thus, we turn to supplements!
So, what do we need to know?
• Avoid high doses of vitamin E supplements, which have not proven effective in helping to reduce heart disease, as some had thought.
• Smokers who take high doses of beta carotene supplements also can have adverse effects.
• Antioxidant cocktails can interfere with cholesterol-lowering drugs.
• Choose quality supplements; those manufactured to Canadian labeling standards are of a higher quality.
• More does not necessarily mean better.
• Dietary supplements are not required to be standardized in the United States
• Like drugs, dietary supplements have chemical and biological activity. They may have side effects. They may interact with certain medications. These interactions can cause problems and can even be dangerous.
• A supplement supplements the diet; it does not replace it.
• Seek the advice of a qualified expert.
Core Wellness International offers a service that compares and contrasts your supplements with your prescription drugs to identify potential areas of cross-over and enhancement. Visit www.corelimited.com
http://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/dietarysupplements.asp
This week, I have had so many people ask me about a recent study on calcium supplements. The claim of the study is that taking calcium supplements causes a 30% increase in heart attacks. There are some serious problems with the study, a meta-analysis by Professor Ian Reid from the Department of Medicine at the University of Auckland, and published in the British Medical Journal.
A prominent researcher on calcium metabolism (who drafted the WHO recommendations on dietary calcium) Professor Chris Nordin, of Royal Adelaide Hospital, has already questioned the findings. He says that the review is misleading because it does not separate men from women in the findings. According to him “Men are much more liable to heart attacks than women, but women need calcium far more than men, so it is absurd to publish a study of the effect of calcium on the heart without separating men from women.”
My own objections to the study are as follows:
• There are a lot of hazards in the kind of statistical number crunching involved in a meta-analysis. Worst case scenario is, you do a meta-analysis of 11 studies, all of which are flawed in their methods or have doubtful data or conclusions, and what do you get? A larger conclusion based on 11 questionable sets of data. So how accurate were the original 11 studies? We have no idea.
• We do know that in the studies, the calcium was treated as an “independent variable” so magnesium and Vitamin D were not given. Magnesium is needed to balance calcium intake. Vitamin D is needed for proper calcium metabolism. So doing studies that do not provide the other vitamins and minerals needed, could have some very poor results. Maybe calcium supplements, specifically when given without magnesium and Vitamin D do cause additional calcium deposits in the arteries, and therefore more heart attacks. But right now we don’t know, and the meta-analysis is not sufficient evidence to tell us.
So, what to do? Bottom line—there are many long term studies showing that calcium supplementation is safe. Here are my recommendations.
• Calcium-magnesium-Vitamin D supplementation is especially important for perimenopausal and postmenopausal women.The current recommendation for perimenopausal and postmenopausal women is from 1000 to 1500 mg of calcium per day. Given that most people do get some calcium in their diet, 500 mg of calcium with 250 mg magnesium and 400 IU of Vitamin D (taken all together) is probably enough supplementation, unless the person is allergic to dairy.
• Vitamin D is very important to bone health. There are many people walking around with Vitamin D deficiency in the United States—not enough sun exposure, and not enough Vitamin D in their diets. In addition to osteoporosis, Vitamin D deficiency also is a factor in Alzheimer’s disease. So get your Vitamin D level taken, and if it is low, you may need to take more like 2000 IU or more per day until your level gets up to normal. Take the Vitamin D orally, do not accept high dose injections—they have been associated with atypical bone fractures.
Vitamin D is a fat soluble vitamin we obtain mostly from sunlight and in small amounts from certain foods. Sunlight contains ultraviolet (UV) rays and it is the UV-B rays that are capable of producing vitamin D in your body by acting on the cholesterol in your skin. For almost 30 years the conventional thought around vitamin D has been that 10 minutes of sunlight on your arms and legs every day will provide the necessary amount of D.
Although this sounds like great advice it is really an oversimplification of some complicated biochemistry in your body. In order for the D producing UV-B rays to reach your skin and produce vitamin D depends on a variety of different factors:
Skin Color: Lighter skin color allows deeper penetration by UV-B rays, which decreases the amount of sunlight exposure needed for adequate vitamin D production. That means darker complexions will need longer amounts of sunlight to produce the same amount of D.
Season: if you live above 35 degrees latitude north or below 35 degrees latitude south there are little to no UV-B rays from early autumn to late spring.
Altitude: The higher you live above sea level, the greater exposure you have to UV-B rays.
Pollution and Clouds: Both of these factors influence the number of UV-B rays reaching your skin.
Age: Aging creates changes that make it difficult for UV-B rays to convert cholesterol to vitamin D. Elderly people need to rely almost exclusively on food sources rather than sunlight for their vitamin D needs.
Vitamin D Facts:
Vitamin D has been shown to influence over 2,000 genes in your body. That is why it influences so many diseases like cancer, autism, heart disease and rheumatoid arthritis. A study by Dr. William Grant, Ph.D., internationally recognized research scientist and vitamin D expert, found that about 30% of cancer deaths (that is 2 million worldwide and 200,000 in the United States) could be prevented each year by simply correcting levels of vitamin D.
Vitamin D is you best defense against colds and flu. Vitamin D regulates the expression of genes that influence your immune system to attack and destroy bacteria and viruses. People with optimal levels of Vitamin D rarely get sick.
Many research studies have concluded that up to 95% of U.S. senior citizens are deficient in Vitamin D. Those same studies show that all Americans are upwards of 85% deficient regardless of age.
Vitamin D deficiency is epidemic in adults of all ages who have a darker complexion such as those whose ancestors are from Africa, the Middle East, or India.
The increased public fear around skin cancer and the use of sun blocking agents also keeps the beneficial UV-B rays from penetrating the skin thereby adding to the Vitamin D deficiency. Many people limit their outdoor activities preventing them from getting the needed sun exposure.
Vitamin D helps your body regulate its blood sugar levels, playing an important role in preventing type II diabetes. Research shows that 60% of type 2 diabetics have vitamin D deficiency.
Studies also show very low levels of vitamin D among children, the elderly, and women.
One U.S. study of women revealed that half of African American women of childbearing age could be vitamin D deficient predisposing their children to both immune and developmental disorders.
The current Dietary Reference Intakes by the Institute of Medicine range from 200 to 600 IU per day depending on age, with the U.S. upper limit for vitamin D being 2,000 IU per day. These numbers are out of date. They do not take into account a great deal of research on vitamin D and its effect on human health that’s been published over the last several years.
To recommend a particular dose for everyone is ridiculous given the different influences we have already discussed. I recommend that everyone get their blood levels monitored to be certain that there is a need for Vitamin D therapy, and to ensure the therapy is effective. Some will not need vitamin D while others can need as much as 50,000iu for short periods of time. I find the majority of patients that I work with in the Chicago area need 5,000-7,000iu in the fall and winter and 3,000-5,000iu in the spring and summer. It is important to understand that in the summertime, when you sunbathe for 30 minutes, your body produces about 20,000 IUs of vitamin D. So the quantities I am recommending are not too high. No matter where you live have your serum vitamin D levels checked. Ask your doctor or laboratory for the 25(OH)D test, also known as the 25-hydroxyvitamin D test. Please note that some labs do a similar test called 1-25(OH)D test, which is not as accurate a marker of your vitamin D status.
Most people should also strive to eat some foods that are naturally rich in vitamin D, such as:
| Food Sources | Serving | Vitamin D (IU) |
| Wild salmon | 3 ounces | 530 |
| Cod liver oil | 1 teaspoon | 400 |
| Sardines, canned | 3 ounces | 231 |
| Organic egg yolk | 1 medium | 25 |
| Octinoxate (Octyl Methoxycinnamate) | The most widely used sunscreen ingredient, known for its low potential to sensitize skin or act as a phototallergen. Estrogenic effects are noted in laboratory animals as well as disruption of thyroid hormone and brain signaling. Has been found to kill mouse cells even at low doses when exposed to sunlight! |
| Oxybenzone (Benzophenone-3) | Associated with photoallergic reactions. This chemical absorbs through your skin in significant amounts. It contaminates the bodies of 97% of Americans according to Centers for Disease Control research. Health concerns include hormone disruption and cancer. |
| Octisalate | Octisalate is a weak UVB absorber with a generally good safety profile among sunscreen ingredients. It is a penetration enhancer, which may increase the amount of other ingredients passing through skin. |
| Avobenzone (Parsol 1789) | Primarily a UVA-absorbing agent, sunlight causes this unstable ingredient to break down into unknown chemicals, especially in the presence of another active, Octinoxate. |
| Octocrylene | Produces oxygen radicals when exposed to UV light. |
| Homosalate | Research indicates it is a weak hormone disruptor, forms toxic metabolites, and can enhance the penetration of a toxic herbicide. |
| Micronized Titanium Dioxide | Sunscreens with micronized titanium dioxide may contain nanoparticles. Micronized TiO2 offers greater sun protection than conventional (larger) particles. These small particles do not penetrate skin but may be more toxic to living cells and the environment. Inhalation of powders and sprays is a concern. |
| Micronized Zinc Oxide | Same as Micronized Titanium Dioxide, above. |
| Titanium Dioxide | Appears safe for use on skin, due to low penetration but inhalation is a concern. |
| Ensulizole (Phenylbenzimidazole Sulfonic Acid) | Known to produce free radicals when exposed to sunlight, leading to damage of DNA, this UVB protector may have the potential to cause cancer. |
| Nano Zinc Oxide | Nano zinc oxide offers greater sun protection than larger zinc particles. Comparatively little is known regarding potential health effects of nanoparticles. They do not penetrate healthy skin, and thus appear to pose a low health risk in lotions. Inhalation of powders and sprays is a concern. |
| Nano Titanium Dioxide | Same as Nano Zinc Oxide, above. |
| Zinc Oxide | Zinc has a long history of use in sunscreen and other skin care products; little absorption and no adverse health effects are reported. |
| Padimate O (Octyl Dimethyl PABA / PABA Ester) | A derivative of the once-popular PABA sunscreen ingredient, research shows this chemical releases free radicals, damages DNA, has estrogenic activity, and causes allergic reactions in some people. |
| Menthyl Anthranilate | 1 study found that it produces damaging reactive oxygen species when exposed to sunlight. |
| Mexoryl SX | 2 hours of sunlight can degrade as much as 40% of this active ingredient. Low skin penetration. |
| Methylene Bis-Benzotriazolyl Tetramethylbutylphenol | Not an approved active ingredient in the U.S. Few studies exist on this chemical. It is photostable and does not absorb through your skin. |
| Sulisobenzone (Benzophenone-4) | Can cause skin and eye irritation. Does not penetrate your skin to a large degree, but enhances the ability of other chemicals to penetrate. |
| Benzophenone-2 | Not approved for use in United States sunscreens. Concerns about hormone disruption. |
This table provided by www.mercola.com